» Plaine Commune » Traffic » Express decision (demo only) #3

i5: Paint the Town Hall
Draft revision 8

Paint the town hall in red

Reason

It's time!

About Suggestions

Specify color: good idea. done. -adopted-
Blue: Thank you but I don't think this is a good idea. - not adopted-

Source

Express decision (demo only) #3

1. Admission (reached 1)

2. Discussion (finished)

3. Verification (reached 10.0% / 1)

4. Voting (finished)

Finished with winner

Competing initiatives

Competing initiatives in pairwise comparison to winner:
i6: Let's paint our town hall in blue
by Andreas Nitsche
i7: Paint the town hall with white color
by Björn Swierczek
i8: i8: Leave Town Hall at it is
by Alejandro Blanco-M

TRACE

System trace (for computer programmers purposes)

this: u=1.7, d=0.0, t=1.7 | children: u=0.0, d=0.0, t=0.0 | total: u=1.7, d=0.0, t=1.7 ms
Configuration "devel"
REQUESTED VIEW: draft/show
this: u=2.9, d=2.8, t=5.6 | children: u=16.8, d=17.3, t=31.9 | total: u=19.7, d=20.2, t=37.5 ms
/main/_filter/20_session.lua
- INSERT INTO "session" ("additional_secret", "ident") VALUES ('sdPRHoCVP8wXzoqH8zUD049t9Rq9gg99dy0zS9hwN1nKWkUG', 'STIXeM8ZSP3CvXzGOKJF4qeS') RETURNING "ident"; 2.8 ms
- this: u=0.4, d=0.0, t=0.4 | children: u=16.3, d=17.3, t=31.5 | total: u=16.8, d=17.3, t=31.9 ms
  /main/_filter/21_auth.lua
  - No authentication needed.
  - this: u=0.6, d=0.0, t=0.6 | children: u=15.7, d=17.3, t=30.8 | total: u=16.3, d=17.3, t=31.5 ms
    /main/_filter_view/30_navigation.lua
    - this: u=0.1, d=0.0, t=0.1 | children: u=15.6, d=17.3, t=30.8 | total: u=15.7, d=17.3, t=30.8 ms
      /main/_filter_view/34_stylesheet.lua
      - this: u=0.1, d=0.0, t=0.1 | children: u=15.5, d=17.3, t=30.6 | total: u=15.6, d=17.3, t=30.8 ms
        /main/_filter_view/36_html_title.lua
        this: u=4.1, d=7.8, t=11.2 | children: u=11.4, d=9.6, t=19.4 | total: u=15.5, d=17.3, t=30.6 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: draft/show
        SELECT "draft".* FROM "draft" WHERE (id = 8) LIMIT 1; 4.8 ms
        SELECT "initiative".* FROM "initiative" WHERE ("initiative"."id" IN (5)); 1.4 ms
        SELECT "issue".*, justify_interval(min_admission_time)::text AS "min_admission_time_text", justify_interval(max_admission_time)::text AS "max_admission_time_text", justify_interval(discussion_time)::text AS "discussion_time_text", justify_interval(verification_time)::text AS "verification_time_text", justify_interval(voting_time)::text AS "voting_time_text", justify_interval(coalesce(issue.fully_frozen + issue.voting_time, issue.half_frozen + issue.verification_time, issue.accepted + issue.discussion_time, issue.created + issue.max_admission_time) - now()) AS "state_time_left", justify_interval(now() - issue.closed) AS "closed_ago" FROM "issue" WHERE ("issue"."id" IN (3)); 1.6 ms
        this: u=4.2, d=2.2, t=6.1 | children: u=0.0, d=0.0, t=0.0 | total: u=4.2, d=2.2, t=6.1 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: issue/_head
        SELECT "policy".*, justify_interval(min_admission_time)::text AS "min_admission_time_text", justify_interval(max_admission_time)::text AS "max_admission_time_text", justify_interval(discussion_time)::text AS "discussion_time_text", justify_interval(verification_time)::text AS "verification_time_text", justify_interval(voting_time)::text AS "voting_time_text" FROM "policy" WHERE ("policy"."id" IN (2)); 0.8 ms
        SELECT "area".* FROM "area" WHERE ("area"."id" IN (1)); 0.6 ms
        SELECT "unit".* FROM "unit" WHERE ("unit"."id" IN (1)); 0.7 ms
        this: u=0.1, d=0.0, t=0.1 | children: u=0.0, d=0.0, t=0.0 | total: u=0.1, d=0.0, t=0.1 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: draft/_show
        this: u=0.4, d=0.0, t=0.4 | children: u=6.7, d=7.4, t=12.9 | total: u=7.1, d=7.4, t=13.2 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: issue/_sidebar
        this: u=0.9, d=0.0, t=0.9 | children: u=0.0, d=0.0, t=0.0 | total: u=0.9, d=0.0, t=0.9 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: issue/_sidebar_state
        this: u=0.7, d=0.9, t=1.4 | children: u=5.2, d=6.5, t=10.6 | total: u=5.9, d=7.4, t=12.0 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: issue/_sidebar_issue
        SELECT "initiative".* FROM "initiative" WHERE ("initiative"."issue_id" IN (3)) ORDER BY initiative.admitted DESC NULLS LAST, initiative.rank NULLS LAST, initiative.harmonic_weight DESC NULLS LAST, id; 0.9 ms
        this: u=0.4, d=0.0, t=0.4 | children: u=4.7, d=6.5, t=10.1 | total: u=5.2, d=6.5, t=10.6 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: initiative/_list
        this: u=1.1, d=2.6, t=3.6 | children: u=0.9, d=1.0, t=1.9 | total: u=2.0, d=3.6, t=5.5 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: initiative/_list_element
        SELECT "draft".* FROM "draft" WHERE ("initiative_id" = 6) ORDER BY "id" DESC LIMIT 1; 0.5 ms
        SELECT "member".*, "initiator"."initiative_id" AS "mm_ref_", initiator.accepted AS "accepted" FROM "member" INNER JOIN "initiator" ON "initiator"."member_id" = "member"."id" WHERE ("initiator"."initiative_id" IN (6)) AND (initiator.accepted) ORDER BY member.name; 2.2 ms
        this: u=0.9, d=1.0, t=1.9 | children: u=0.0, d=0.0, t=0.0 | total: u=0.9, d=1.0, t=1.9 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: initiative/_bargraph
        SELECT "battle".* FROM "battle" WHERE (winning_initiative_id = 5) AND (losing_initiative_id = 6) LIMIT 1; 0.4 ms
        SELECT "battle".* FROM "battle" WHERE (winning_initiative_id = 6) AND (losing_initiative_id = 5) LIMIT 1; 0.6 ms
        this: u=0.8, d=0.9, t=1.5 | children: u=0.5, d=0.4, t=0.8 | total: u=1.3, d=1.4, t=2.3 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: initiative/_list_element
        SELECT "draft".* FROM "draft" WHERE ("initiative_id" = 7) ORDER BY "id" DESC LIMIT 1; 0.2 ms
        SELECT "member".*, "initiator"."initiative_id" AS "mm_ref_", initiator.accepted AS "accepted" FROM "member" INNER JOIN "initiator" ON "initiator"."member_id" = "member"."id" WHERE ("initiator"."initiative_id" IN (7)) AND (initiator.accepted) ORDER BY member.name; 0.7 ms
        this: u=0.5, d=0.4, t=0.8 | children: u=0.0, d=0.0, t=0.0 | total: u=0.5, d=0.4, t=0.8 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: initiative/_bargraph
        SELECT "battle".* FROM "battle" WHERE (winning_initiative_id = 5) AND (losing_initiative_id = 7) LIMIT 1; 0.2 ms
        SELECT "battle".* FROM "battle" WHERE (winning_initiative_id = 7) AND (losing_initiative_id = 5) LIMIT 1; 0.2 ms
        this: u=1.2, d=1.2, t=1.9 | children: u=0.3, d=0.3, t=0.5 | total: u=1.4, d=1.5, t=2.4 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: initiative/_list_element
        SELECT "draft".* FROM "draft" WHERE ("initiative_id" = 8) ORDER BY "id" DESC LIMIT 1; 0.4 ms
        SELECT "member".*, "initiator"."initiative_id" AS "mm_ref_", initiator.accepted AS "accepted" FROM "member" INNER JOIN "initiator" ON "initiator"."member_id" = "member"."id" WHERE ("initiator"."initiative_id" IN (8)) AND (initiator.accepted) ORDER BY member.name; 0.8 ms
        this: u=0.3, d=0.3, t=0.5 | children: u=0.0, d=0.0, t=0.0 | total: u=0.3, d=0.3, t=0.5 ms
        EXECUTE VIEW: initiative/_bargraph
        SELECT "battle".* FROM "battle" WHERE (winning_initiative_id = 5) AND (losing_initiative_id = 8) LIMIT 1; 0.2 ms
        SELECT "battle".* FROM "battle" WHERE (winning_initiative_id = 8) AND (losing_initiative_id = 5) LIMIT 1; 0.1 ms
  - End of authentication filter.

i5: Paint the Town HallDraft revision 8

Reason

About Suggestions

Express decision (demo only) #3

Competing initiatives

System trace (for computer programmers purposes)

i5: Paint the Town Hall
Draft revision 8